Since the question had never been addressed systematically, she and colleague Maria J. But then a workshop led her to consider proving that violent resistance was more successful than the nonviolent kind. She had studied terrorism, civil war, and major revolutions - Russian, French, Algerian, and American - and suspected that only violent force had achieved major social and political change. When Erica Chenoweth started her predoctoral fellowship at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs in 2006, she believed in the strategic logic of armed resistance. Recent research suggests that nonviolent civil resistance is far more successful in creating broad-based change than violent campaigns are, a somewhat surprising finding with a story behind it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |